Property & housing · primary vertical
Find tenant cases before tenants call another lawyer.
We show you housing cases before they hit the market. Public complaints, code trails, and regulatory noise get mapped into clusters you can convert into signed contingency files, while other firms are still buying shared leads.
Cluster-based pricing model. Predictable costs tied to case opportunity, not per-lead auctions.
- ▸See buildings generating multiple viable tenant claims, not one-off noise.
- ▸Identify repeat-violator landlords before competitors run the same docket search.
- ▸Sign buildings before they reach the open market: owned clusters, not recycled leads.
Pilot allocation: We work with one firm per market during pilot deployments—exclusive geography, not a shared lead list.
Why timing decides who gets the file
Most viable tenant cases are visible in public data long before anyone searches for counsel. By the time they do, you are bidding against every firm with an ads budget and the same lead vendors.
Limira moves you upstream: uncontested conversations with people who have not yet been sold to five shops. That is the difference between a contingency practice that scales and one that races to the bottom on intake spend.
What we're seeing right now
Example opportunity (illustrative)
Pilot teams review clusters like this weekly: real geography, repeated landlord behavior, and a defendable story long before retainers scatter across firms.
- Market
- Midwestern metro · near-downtown corridor (example)
- Cluster
- Twelve units across four buildings under the same management entity; overlapping habitability and retaliation narratives over a 60-day window.
- Landlord pattern
- Repeated failure-to-repair after written notices; documented rent pressure after tenant organizing in two units.
- Likely claim spine
- State habitability and retaliation; potential rent-board or local ordinance hooks depending on jurisdiction.
- Tenant opportunity
- Roughly 8-15 households with linked timelines and common ownership, which is large enough to merit KYR outreach, small enough to move before the market notices.
Composite example for illustration. This isnot a live feed or guarantee of outcomes. Your market and facts will differ; the pattern is what we surface early.
Early sources of case emergence
Public trails tenants and workers leave before they retain counsel, mapped into validated clusters you can pursue, not dashboards you babysit.
Identifies violations across tenant cohorts
Multi-unit complaint patterns become validated clusters large enough to move before firms compete on the same claimants.
Systematic housing violations
Recurring code and habitability issues tied to ownership entities, validated into case-ready narratives before outreach.
Repeat-violator landlord mapping
Links management entities across buildings and filings so your team can prioritize scalable, defendable matters.
Attorney-reviewed viability
Clusters are reviewed for legal viability and jurisdictional fit before engagement begins.
How cases land on your desk
From raw complaints to signed retainers in days, not months.
Every stage is built for one outcome: exclusive files you can litigate, filed before competitors burn spend on the same claimants. One firm per market where possible during pilot. No shared lead lists.
Violation detected
Public data clusters harm patterns
Cohort validated
Attorney-reviewed for viability
Pre-aware engagement
Educational, not solicitation
Exclusive file
Owned cluster, not shared leads
Pilot allocation: We work with one firm per market during pilot deployments—exclusive geography, not a shared lead list.